A thinking layer for law & jurisprudence法律与法理的思维层

Put your question to the greatest legal minds in history. 把你的问题,交给历史上最伟大的法律头脑。

Ask a question and hear a reasoned answer in the voice of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Antonin Scalia, Ronald Dworkin, Oliver Wendell Holmes or Montesquieu. Understand constitutional principles, judicial reasoning and the foundations of justice — through authentic AI-simulated dialogue. 提出一个问题,听金斯伯格、斯卡利亚、德沃金、霍姆斯或孟德斯鸠以其口吻给出有理有据的回答。通过逼真的 AI 模拟对话,理解宪法原则、司法推理与正义的根基。

Live now at law.x1000.ai已上线 · law.x1000.ai

For legal education and understanding — not legal advice, and never a substitute for a licensed attorney. 用于法律教育与理解——不构成法律意见,也不能替代执业律师。

⚖️
Straight talk: this is a legal education and jurisprudence product, not legal advice. AI personas simulate a thinker's perspective to help you learn — they may be wrong, do not represent the real person or their estate, and never replace a licensed attorney. Of the 100 profiles, 10 have working AI dialogue today; the rest are reference profiles as more personas are authored. 实话实说:这是法律教育与法理产品,不构成法律意见。AI 分身模拟某位思想家的视角以助学习——可能出错,不代表真人或其遗产管理方,也绝不能替代执业律师。100 位档案中,目前 10 位可进行 AI 对话,其余为参考档案,将随更多分身完成而陆续开放。
How it works玩法

Three steps to your first legal dialogue三步开启第一场法律对话

No account setup, no casebook. Open the app and ask.无需注册配置、无需案例集。打开就能问。

1

Choose a legal mind选一位法律思想家

Pick from ten fully-voiced jurists and philosophers — Ginsburg, Scalia, Dworkin, Holmes, Montesquieu, Hayek, Schmitt, Fuller, Sunstein, Arendt. Each has a distinct philosophy and reasoning style.从十位声线完备的法学家与哲学家中选择——金斯伯格、斯卡利亚、德沃金、霍姆斯、孟德斯鸠、哈耶克、施密特、富勒、桑斯坦、阿伦特。每位各有其法哲学与推理风格。

2

Ask your question提出你的问题

Type into a clean, discourse-style feed — constitutional interpretation, rights, the rule of law, a hard case. Curiosity welcome; no legal background required.在简洁的讨论式信息流中输入——宪法解释、权利、法治、疑难案件皆可。欢迎好奇,无需法律背景。

3

Read & reason阅读与思辨

Get a Markdown-formatted answer in the thinker's voice, with case citations and related concepts — plus a clear AI disclaimer. Earn HOPE Points as you explore.收到以该思想家口吻写就的 Markdown 回答,附案例引用与相关概念,并附清晰的 AI 免责声明。边探索边赚取 HOPE 积分。

What you get你能得到

Built for understanding, not for filing briefs为“理解”而造,不为“出具文书”

👤

Authentic legal personas逼真的法律人格

Persona prompts grounded in each jurist's real work, cases and philosophy — a distinct voice, tone and reasoning style for every mind.分身提示词基于每位法学家真实的著作、判例与法哲学——每位都有独特的语气与推理方式。

📜

Citations & concepts引用与概念

Answers extract case citations and surface related legal concepts, so a reply becomes a starting point for real study.回答会抽取判例引用并呈现相关法律概念,让每次回复成为深入研习的起点。

💬

Discourse-style feed讨论式信息流

A familiar, low-pressure question-and-answer interface that makes constitutional theory feel approachable.熟悉、零压力的问答界面,让宪法理论变得亲切可近。

⚖️

Perspectives across the spectrum跨立场的多元视角

Liberal, originalist, natural-law, realist and libertarian voices — see how great jurists reason from different first principles.自由派、原旨主义、自然法、现实主义与自由意志主义并存——看顶尖法学家如何从不同的第一原则出发推理。

🤖

GPT-4 poweredGPT-4 驱动

Replies are generated by a state-of-the-art model tuned to each thinker's voice, with an AI disclaimer on every answer.回复由前沿模型生成,并按每位思想家的语气调校,每条回答均附 AI 免责声明。

✨

HOPE PointsHOPE 积分

Free in-app credits let you ask and explore; rate answers to earn more. A light way to keep learning, no card required.免费的应用内积分让你随时提问与探索;为回答评分即可赚回更多。轻量地持续学习,无需绑卡。

The minds思想家阵容

Ten voices you can talk to today今天就能对话的十位

From the Enlightenment to the modern Supreme Court — every tradition, every stance.从启蒙时代到现代最高法院——每种传统、每种立场。

⚖️ Ruth Bader Ginsburg 1933–2020 📜 Antonin Scalia 1936–2016 📚 Ronald Dworkin 1931–2013 🏛️ Oliver Wendell Holmes 1841–1935 🏟️ Montesquieu 1689–1755 💰 Friedrich Hayek 1899–1992 ⚡ Carl Schmitt 1888–1985 📑 Lon Fuller 1902–1978 🧠 Cass Sunstein b.1954 🌐 Hannah Arendt 1906–1975

Plus 90 reference profiles being brought online — a growing roster toward 100 legal minds.另有90 位参考档案正在陆续接入——迈向100 位法律思想家的完整阵容。

Who it's for适合谁

For anyone who wants to reason, not just look things up写给想要“思辨”而不只“查询”的人

🎓

Law students & professors法学院师生

⚖️

Legal professionals法律从业者

🏛️

Political science & philosophy政治学与哲学学习者

📚

The justice-curious public关心正义的公众

Access方案

Free to use today. Paid tiers are planned.目前可免费使用,付费层级仍在规划。

💡 Honest status: the platform runs on free in-app HOPE Points today. The paid tiers below are the project's planned commercialization — figures shown are the team's own proposal, not yet live billing. Join the waitlist or contact us to help shape them. 💡 诚实说明:平台目前以免费的应用内 HOPE 积分运行。下方付费层级是本项目规划中的商业化方向——所示数字为团队自己的提案,尚未开通计费。可加入等候名单或联系我们共同参与设计。
Live today现已上线

HOPE PointsHOPE 积分

$0
Free in-app credits — start reasoning right away, no card.免费应用内积分——立刻开始思辨,无需绑卡。
  • 1,500 HOPE Points to start初始 1,500 HOPE 积分
  • 50 points per question每次提问 50 积分
  • Earn points back by rating answers为回答评分赚回积分
  • All 10 active legal minds全部 10 位在线思想家
Start free免费开始
B2B · contact机构合作 · 洽询

Institutions高校 / 机构

Custom定制
Knowledge licensing and internal training for law schools and legal organizations.面向法学院与法律机构的知识授权与内训。
  • Curriculum & classroom use课程与课堂使用
  • Custom persona sets定制思想家阵容
  • Licensing & training packages授权与培训方案
  • Talk to us about scope & pricing就范围与定价与我们洽谈
Contact us联系我们

Ask a question worthy of a great mind.提一个配得上伟大头脑的问题。

Curiosity is free. Open the app, choose a jurist, and put your hardest question about justice to them.好奇不花钱。打开应用,选一位法学家,把你关于正义最难的问题抛给他们。

Start a dialogue →开始对话 →